Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2005-04-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2005-04-12 House Journal Page 1001 HB 184 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 11, 2005, calendar (page 969), was read the third time: HOUSE BILL NO. 184 "An Act relating to firearms." Representative Stoltze moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Stoltze was required to vote. Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 184 be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 1, line 6, following "law": Insert ". This subsection does not limit the authority of a municipality to adopt or enact an ordinance that provides reasonable restrictions on the discharge of firearms within the municipality" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Gruenberg objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Gruenberg: Delete "discharge" Insert "use" 2005-04-12 House Journal Page 1002 Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Chenault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 184 Second Reading Amendment to Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 3 Yeas: Cissna, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Berkowitz, Joule, Kapsner Absent: Guttenberg, Ramras, Weyhrauch And so, Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. There being no further objection, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 184 am be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 2. Representative Stoltze objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Gruenberg: Page 1, line 5: Delete "inconsistent" Insert "in conflict" 2005-04-12 House Journal Page 1003 Representative Gruenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Chenault objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 184 am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Cissna, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Kerttula, Meyer, Moses, Seaton, Weyhrauch Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Berkowitz, Joule, Kapsner Absent: Guttenberg And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. HB 184 am was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall HB 184 am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 184 am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 32 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gardner, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson 2005-04-12 House Journal Page 1004 Nays: Cissna, Gara, Gruenberg, Kerttula Excused: Berkowitz, Joule, Kapsner Absent: Guttenberg And so, HB 184 am passed the House. Representative Kerttula gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HB 184 am.